Ban Doga
   |
Posted - 2010.08.03 18:19:00 -
[1]
have you ever participated in a sisi mass test?
Yes
what role do you play in eve? (smallcorp/bigcorp/alliance highsec/lowsec/0.0 resident)
Smallcorp Highsec
do you regularly participate in big 0.0 fleet fights?
No
were any of these factors the reason you have been prevented in participating in a mass test on sisi?
-didn't believe the test would accomplish anything
Yes
-sisi patching was too hard, gave up
No
-generally didnt care
No
-wasn't aware of it
No
-scheduled at a bad time
Yes
-previous tests were poorly conducted so i no longer participated (please specify)
No (see also "other")
-other please specify
No tangible results since I started to join those tests in February
would you participate in a sisi mass test if they gave you perks you would never get on TQ like max skillpoints, or supercaps?
No (would have been different 2 months ago)
would you participate in a sisi mass test if there was a TQ tournament going on that required it(specifically, the sort of player-run sort of events that don't involve creation of isk)?
No
would you participate in a sisi mass test if someone really famous and well liked commanded the fleet on sisi?
Maybe.
if they used code injection on TQ in a fleet fight but only if both parties consented, and everyone knew in advance that there would be no reimbursement just like usual, would you ever consent to participating in the test(although this question is probably moot unless you're an FC, I'd also like to know if this idea ****es you off a lot or if you think it's a good idea)?
I think that's a great idea. I'd consent.
what sort of situations would be excluded from ever being tested if CCP refused to give reimbursement for deaths incurred during TQ code injection ****ups?
No idea.
would you ever participate in any sort of sisi mass testing if there was no immediate and direct isk reward on TQ?
Yes, I already did.
is there anything major that this survey has missed that you think could greatly help the testing effort?
Yes, "What would it take to make you participate?" and my answer to that would be
"A clear statement about the problem that is under investigation, an idea about what change is being used (this would have to be rather abstract, I'm not looking for confidential technical information), a thorough follow up (average FPS and a "well a bit worse than last time" is something I can see first-hand in my own client; I'm talking about expected result, actual result, reasons for difference), a decision if that change will be kept / reverted / modified and when (if at all) it will hit TQ"
I'm tired of this vague, completely ambiguous, totally open-ended "we're working on it, it will change soon".
|